Peer Review Process

All submitted papers will be sent to two international and one national reviewer (who are expert in the field) for blind peer review. Reviewers will provide comments and critiques in a confidential, constructive, prompt and unbiased manner appropriate for their position of responsibility. Collegiality, respect for author’s dignity and the research for ways to improve the quality of the manuscript should characterize the review process.

On receiving a manuscript if the Editor finds that the submitted manuscript is of sufficient quality and falls within the scope of the journal, they will assign the manuscript to two international and one national reviewers, provided that no conflict of interests exists between these reviewers and the manuscript’s authors.  The reviewers will submit their reports on the manuscripts along with their recommendation of one of the following actions to the Editor:

  • Publish in its present form
  • Consider after Minor Changes
  • Consider after Major Changes
  • Reject

After receiving reports from all reviewers, the Editor can make one of the following editorial recommendations:

  • Publish in its present form
  • Consider after Minor Changes
  • Consider after Major Changes
  • Reject